Home › Resources › IDEaS challenges for small companies

IDEaS challenges: how DND supports defence innovation from small companies

A small company does not need to sell a finished military product to have something useful for defence. It might have a sensor, a software method, a material or a different way to solve a practical problem. The important question is whether that solution addresses a specific need and can be developed or demonstrated credibly.

Innovation for Defence Excellence and Security, or IDEaS, is a Department of National Defence program that supports solutions to defence and security challenges. It offers development funding, collaboration and testing opportunities. Participation is not the same as winning a large equipment contract, and it does not guarantee future purchases.

Last reviewed: September 29, 2026. This is an independent BidDesk guide. The current call for proposals and its amendments determine eligibility, funding, deadlines and submission requirements.

Start with the challenge, not your product brochure

Read the challenge statement before deciding that your technology is a fit. What problem is the defence team trying to solve? In what conditions must a solution work? What result would make it useful?

Then explain how your approach addresses that need. A strong proposal connects the proposed work to the challenge, identifies what is already demonstrated and sets out what still needs to be tested. A familiar technology with a defence label added is not automatically a convincing answer.

IDEaS is not limited to one industry or only to hardware. Its official FAQ says non-technical solutions can be funded where appropriate to the challenge. The actual call decides what is in scope.

Understand the different program elements

The official program overview describes five elements. They serve different purposes, so do not assume that every opportunity uses the same application or funding structure.

Competitive Projects supports development through phased work. Innovation Networks supports research clusters and collaboration. Contests reward approaches through competition. Sandboxes give innovators opportunities to demonstrate concepts and prototypes to defence experts and potential users. Test Drives let the defence team test advanced solutions.

Choose the opportunity that matches what you have and what you need to learn. An early research idea and a working prototype should not be described as though they are at the same stage. A demonstration can be valuable, but it is not a promise of an order.

Describe technology readiness honestly

Technology Readiness Level, or TRL, is a way to describe how mature a technology is. The scale runs from early scientific work through tested and proven solutions. It is not a confidence score or a label you choose to sound more advanced.

The current Competitive Projects page groups development around conceiving, designing and building solutions, with entry based on maturity. Consult that page and the particular call rather than assuming every applicant starts at the beginning.

Support your maturity claim with evidence. Separate a simulation from a laboratory test and a laboratory test from field performance. Explain the test conditions, results and remaining limitations. If an important result is only planned, call it planned.

Check eligibility and Canadian content early

The program welcomes different kinds of innovators, including businesses, academics, not-for-profit organizations and individuals. That broad invitation is not a substitute for the eligibility rules of a particular opportunity.

Read the applicant rules, Canadian-content requirements, eligible activities and any restrictions on partners or organizations. The FAQ says Canadian-content expectations are set by each call. Do not assume that being incorporated in Canada automatically satisfies every content requirement.

For a small company, list who will do the work, where it will happen and what outside capabilities are needed. If you require a laboratory, specialist or partner, establish the arrangement before promising their contribution. Keep the proposal consistent with the team's real capacity.

Build a work plan an evaluator can follow

Describe the problem, your proposed solution, the evidence supporting it and the next development step. Break that step into activities, outputs and tests. Explain what success would look like and how you would measure it.

Include the main risks and what you would do if a test does not produce the expected result. A credible development proposal can contain uncertainty. Hiding uncertainty makes it harder to understand what the project will actually establish.

Follow the required response structure and limits. If the call asks for a particular form, budget or attachment, use it. Keep claims aligned across the technical response, financial material and supporting documents. A promising idea still needs a complete application.

Funding is not guaranteed follow-on procurement

IDEaS supports development and evaluation. Moving between phases or into another element depends on assessment and the rules of the opportunity; it is not automatic progression.

The FAQ distinguishes limited purchases for operational evaluation from larger acquisitions to equip the defence department, which would use a separate procurement process. It also describes the POINT initiative, which can include an acquisition option in selected calls at Canada's discretion.

That is why neither "IDEaS never buys anything" nor "IDEaS funding guarantees a defence contract" is accurate. Read the acquisition terms of the specific opportunity. Build your business plan around the agreement you could actually receive, not an assumed future fleet-wide sale.

Read the intellectual-property terms

The FAQ says intellectual property arising from program funding remains with the recipient, while the Crown receives specified licence rights. Retaining ownership does not mean the government has no rights to use or share the resulting material for the purposes described.

Read the actual agreement before relying on a short summary. Identify existing technology, new project results, partner contributions and any third-party restrictions. Seek appropriate legal advice where the licence or ownership terms affect your commercial plans.

Prepare the route to submission

Check the current opportunity's deadline, question process, forms and delivery method. If it is posted through CanadaBuys or uses SAP Business Network, our CanadaBuys walkthrough explains the basic distinction between a notice and a bidding account. Do not assume every IDEaS element uses that route.

For other public-sector opportunities, our MERX guide explains commercial tender-platform access. Neither platform changes the program's eligibility or evaluation rules.

Collect the full call, supporting documents and amendments. Assign an owner to technical evidence, the work plan, budget and final approval. Leave time for checking and submission confirmation. Declining a poor-fit challenge is often better than spending scarce development time on a weak application.